New
Faculty Scholar Award Application Form
NEXT DEADLINE:
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
New
Faculty Scholar Award Application
Guidelines
I.
OVERVIEW
New
Faculty Scholar Awards from the Senate Scholarly
Activities Committee (SSAC) are intended to
provide extra support for Research and Creative
Activity of assistant professors who have completed
less than three years at UND and have demonstrated
outstanding progress, promise, and creative
activity. The Committee will make approximately
three to seven awards each year of up to $5,000
each.
Program
Objectives ~ The Senate Scholarly Activities
Committee awards grants to faculty and staff
in order to encourage research and creative
activity at the University. New Faculty
Scholar Awards are intended to provide funds
to faculty members who have completed less than
three years at UND to initiate a research or
creative activity program. The SSAC anticipates
that many New Faculty Scholar Awards will lead
to the development of projects that will ultimately
be funded by external agencies.
Limitations
~ The Committee will not consider more than
one research/creative activity application or
New Faculty Scholar award from an individual
at any one meeting; however, such grants may
be requested concurrent with a SSAC travel or
publication grant.
Although
an individual will not be allowed to hold more
than one active SSAC Research/Creative Activity
grant or New Faculty Scholar Award at any given
time, it is permissible to apply for both in
the same application round. If an individual
chooses to apply for both, no more than one
award will be made, and the Research/Creative
Activity application will not be considered
if a New Faculty Scholar Award is made. As the
Research/Creative Activity grant and New Faculty
Scholar Award have different budgetary allowances,
it is required that two simultaneous applications
reflect this difference via substantial distinctions
in financial requirements and proposed activities.
Continuous
support will not be provided
for a specific project or for any one faculty
member.
Projects
to improve teaching will not be considered by
the SSAC. Support for such projects should be
requested from the Office of Instructional Development.
[Return to top of page]
II.
ALLOWABLE AND UNALLOWABLE COSTS
The SSAC will consider projects that
request funds to:
- Conduct
both pure and applied research.
- Support
writing projects.
- Support
other creative and scholarly endeavors (e.g.,
performances, art projects, compositions).
All
costs normally incurred in the conduct of the
research or creative activity (i.e., equipment,
consumable supplies, travel to sources, technical
assistance, stenographic assistance, etc.) are
eligible budget items. Travel costs which are
essential to the conduct of the project may
be requested (such as travel to collect specimens
at remote sites, travel to confer with collaborators,
travel to conduct experiments at remote labs,
etc.). Travel to present papers or attend conferences
is not allowable under this program. Equipment
requests must include cost estimates, justification,
and be clearly tied to the research question
or creative activity.
The
budget must be fully itemized and consistent
with the scope of the project. Any personnel
costs should reflect the rate of payment (i.e.,
hourly, monthly, per page, etc.), as well as
the total payment, and the recipient should
be identified by function and by name, if possible.
Cost
items which are not allowable in New Faculty
Scholar Awards are:
- Salary
support for thesis or dissertation research
of graduate students or any other support
for thesis or dissertation research of graduate
students apart from the creative activity
proposed by the faculty member as Principal
Investigator. For those activities that will
be used toward a thesis or dissertation, an
explanation of the relationship of the proposed
work to the Prinicpal Investigator's research/creative
activity must be included.
- Travel
to professional or other meetings (complete
SSAC travel application form).
- Publication
costs such as page charges or subsidies to
publishers of books (complete SSAC publication
application form).
- Salary
of the Principal Investigator.
[Return to top of page]
III.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
All assistant professors who have completed
less than three years at the University of North
Dakota are eligible to apply for this award
subject to the limitations indicated in Section
I.
Because
a major purpose of SSAC grants is to encourage
and develop the scholarly expertise and professional
reputation of UND faculty, applicants who receive
an award and subsequently find they will be
leaving the University must notify the Senate
Scholarly Activities Committee chairperson and
discuss possible termination of the grant.
[Return to top of page]
IV.
AWARD CRITERIA
The Committee will consider the following
factors in reviewing your application:
- Excellence
and clarity (to committee members who may
not be experts in the applicant’s field)
of the application as judged by the committee;
- Potential
national prominence of the applicant;
- Plans
for external funding or future scholarly or
creative activity.
- Current
external funding.
[Return to top of page]
V.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS
Proposal Requirements ~ All applications
for New Faculty Scholar Awards must include
the following: the attached completed forms,
letter of support from the departmental chair,
and the applicant's resume. Where appropriate,
supplemental pages may be appended, but no more
than three additional pages are allowed. The
original application and eleven(11) copies should
be submitted to the SSAC prior to the published
deadline. Please number the pages in your proposal.
Deadlines
~ Application deadlines are set by the SSAC
each year. Only one competition will be held
for Faculty Scholar Awards each year. The actual
deadline for submitting proposals will be announced
in the University Letter and on RD&C’s
home page.
[Return to top of page]
VI.
ASSURANCES AND CLEARANCES
Any project which proposes to use human
subjects or animals in research must be approved
by the appropriate University committee before
research is initiated. Faculty/staff who use
recombinant DNA, radiation, or other biohazards
in their research must also have approval from
the appropriate committee; however, that approval
is given to the investigator and is not generally
required for each individual project.
| Involvement
of |
UND
Committee |
| Human
Subjects |
Institutional Review Board (IRB) |
| Animals
in Research |
Institutional
Animal Care and Use (IACUC) |
Recombinant
DNA |
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) |
Hazardous
Materials |
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) |
| Radioactive Materials |
Radiation Safety and Hazardous Materials |
While
faculty may obtain these reviews after a project
has been approved for funding by the Senate
Scholarly Activities Committee, it is recommended
that the reviews and approvals be sought either
prior to or at the time the application is submitted
to the Committee. This will avoid delays in
beginning the research and establishing a grant
account. The research may not be initiated until
these approvals have been received. Copies of
the approvals should be submitted to the SSAC.
Information on submitting a project for the
necessary reviews may be obtained from RD&C.
[Return to top of page]
VII.
REVIEW AND NOTIFICATION
Committee
Action ~ Applications will be reviewed
by the committee within approximately one month
after the application deadline.
Faculty
will receive a letter from the SSAC Chairperson
soon after the Committee's deliberations, indicating
the decision of the SSAC. In cases where the
application is not funded, the letter will indicate
the reasons for the Committee's action. For
those projects funded by the Committee, a Notification
of Award will accompany the letter.
Grant
Period ~ Awards will be made for periods
of up to two years. Unexpended funds from individual
grants will revert to the Senate Scholarly Activities
Committee account unless a written request for
an extension and justification (with a current
financial report) is submitted and authorized
by the SSAC at least one month prior to the
termination date. In no instance will an extension
be permitted for more than one year beyond the
original termination date.
Deviations
from Approved Budget ~ Because the
funds available to the Senate Scholarly Activities
Committee are limited, any over-expenditure
of SSAC accounts will be the responsibility
of the awardee.
Awards
may be used only for the project indicated in
the approved application, and may not be diverted
to other types of research/creative activity
expenses.
In
general, awards are made for a specific project
and the scope of work described. If, in unusual
circumstances, there is a surplus of money,
use of awards funds for purposes outside of
those listed in the approved budget can only
occur after approval of a formal request for
budgetary revision. Requests for budgetary revisions
must be accepted by the Chair or full committee
of the SSAC.
Final
Reports ~ All persons receiving research/creative
activity grants are required to submit final
reports, including a financial statement, at
the termination of the grant. Subsequent applications
will not be considered from anyone who has had
a previous grant unless the final report, including
a current financial statement, has been submitted.
Final reports are due one month following the
termination date. The termination date is defined
as the earlier of the date all awarded funds
are expended or the end of the performance period
specified in the grant application.
(Revised
March 2009)
[Return to top of page]
|