The Program Assessment Resource
Team, a group of 10 faculty supported by the
Bush Grant in OID and trained to conduct faculty
development in assessment on UND’s campus,
discussed what they considered to be important
elements of assessment and constructed the following
working definition of assessment for UND:
Assessment is a process by which information
from multiple sources is gathered and critically
examined to better understand what our students
are learning in relation to stated learning
goals. Effective assessment results in “informed
decision-making” – documenting
assessment activities with clarity and in
a way that demonstrates continuity and consistency,
and using the results of assessment to improve
student learning.
Key words in the definition communicate principles
of “good assessment”:
Process – assessment is an ongoing activity
that brings added value rather than a periodic
or episodic activity that occurs only at times
when we’re held accountable, such as
re-accreditation visits.
Information from multiple sources – when
we collect data about what our students are
learning we are using multiple methods to do
it, so that from a number of different perspectives
we can understand the whole picture. As we
select assessment methods that are appropriate
to assessing individual student learning goals,
we strive for a balance between what we consider
indirect methods (methods that provide information
about student’s perceptions about what
they have learned such as surveys, questionnaires,
interviews or other studies such as transcript
analyses, graduation rates, job placement,
employer surveys, etc.) and direct methods
(methods that provide information about what
students have learned that come directly from
their work such as course exams, creative performances,
presentations, papers, nationally-normed exams,
portfolios, etc.). Assessment methods can yield
quantitative or qualitative information, either
equally valid in helping us understand what
our students are learning.
Critical examination – Data doesn’t
get put in drawer or file cabinet, but time
is set aside for faculty to analyze data and
draw conclusions.
Stated learning goals – when our program
goals are stated as learning outcomes, i.e.,
what our students should know or be able to
do, they are the foundation for the design
and implementation of an effective assessment
plan.
Informed decision-making – Conclusions
we draw from our assessment results help us
as faculty make educationally sound decisions
about program/curricular improvement.
Documenting assessment activities – In
order to effectively use data and to keep track
of improvement decisions, it is essential to
be building a “body of evidence” that
supports our work in assessing student learning.
Notebooks, files, or portfolios kept in the
department allow data, information and a record
of improvements to be accessible as your work
is ongoing. Good record-keeping is also essential
when we are asked to provide specifics such
as during program review or accreditation visits.
Clarity, continuity, consistency – The
ongoing nature of assessment, whose purpose,
results and use of results are clearly communicated,
becomes the foundation of a campus culture
that promotes continuous improvement.
Improving student learning – As educators,
our ultimate goal. Effective assessment practices
give us information that provides direction
and priorities in decis
|