[Return
to Index]
VI.
INQUIRY PHASE (federal or state funding)
A. |
Purpose
(federal or state funding)
After review by the VPR and an assessment
that there is the possibility of misconduct
under this Policy, the VPR will initiate
an Inquiry, which is the second step in
the review process. In the Inquiry phase,
factual information will be gathered and
expeditiously reviewed to determine whether
or not a further investigation of the
charge (Investigation phase) is warranted.
The Inquiry phase is designed to separate
allegations deserving of further investigation
from frivolous, unjustified, or clearly
mistaken allegations. |
| |
|
B.
|
Process
and Structure (federal or state funding)
|
| |
|
|
1. |
After
a decision has been made to proceed with
an Inquiry, the VPR will appoint an individual
to conduct the Inquiry. That person, the
Inquirer, must be a tenured faculty member
at the rank of associate or full professor
who is without conflict of interest and
has appropriate expertise to evaluate
the information relative to the case.
|
| |
|
|
|
2. |
The
VPR will provide the individual conducting
the Inquiry and the Respondent with copies
of all relevant documents. During the
Inquiry, the VPR and the individual conducting
the inquiry will be responsible for the
security of relevant documents. Originals
of all documents and related communications
are to be securely maintained in the Office
of the Vice President for Research pursuant
to the records retention policy. |
| |
|
|
| |
3. |
Responsibilities
of the individual conducting the Inquiry:
a.
Records of the Inquiry are to be kept
and, at the end of the Inquiry, transferred
to the VPR. The records are to be kept
secure, and if no misconduct is found,
the records should be destroyed six years
after completion of the entire process.
b.
If there is a need for interviews, the
interviews must be tape-recorded and,
upon request, made available to involved
parties after the final decision in the
entire process is made.
c. Information, expert opinions, records,
and other pertinent data may be requested
by the Inquirer. All involved individuals
are expected to cooperate with the Inquirer
by supplying such requested documents
and information.
d.
The Inquiry phase will be completed within
60 working days of its initiation unless
the individual conducting the inquiry
determines that circumstances clearly
warrant an extension of time. In such
circumstances, the Inquirer will advise
the VPR who, in turn, will notify all
relevant parties of the extension. The
record of the Inquiry will include the
rationale for exceeding the 60-working-day
period.
e.
As the Inquiry is intended to be expeditious,
principals are expected to speak for themselves
but may be accompanied by a representative
for advice and counsel.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| C. |
As
the University is responsible for protecting
the health and safety of research subjects,
students, and staff, interim administrative
action prior to conclusion of either the
Inquiry or the Investigation may be indicated.
Such action ranging from slight restrictions
through complete suspension of the Respondent
or the Respondent’s research and
notification of external sponsors, if
indicated, will be initiated by the VPR
in collaboration with the VPAA.
|
| D. |
Findings
(federal or state funding) |
| |
1. |
The
completion of an Inquiry is marked by
a determination of whether or not an investigation
is warranted, thus if warranted invoking
the investigation phase. The individual
conducting the Inquiry shall not recommend
that an investigation occur unless he/she
concludes, based on the sufficient information
for each allegation, that the allegation(s)
have merit to call for an investigation.
The report of the individual conducting
the Inquiry will be conveyed in writing
to the VPR who will be responsible for
communicating the findings to the Respondent
within 10 working days of receipt of the
report. The report of the individual conducting
the inquiry shall specify the information
that was reviewed, summarize relevant
interviews, and include the conclusions
of the Inquiry. The Respondent shall be
given the opportunity to comment in writing
(Memo #2)
upon the findings and recommendations
of the individual conducting the Inquiry.
If the Respondent chooses to comment,
such comments shall be forwarded as soon
as possible but no later than 20 working
days from the date of notification of
the findings by the VPR. The VPR will
notify the Respondent in writing, by certified
mail, return receipt requested. The Respondent’s
comments will become part of the Inquiry
record. |
| |
|
|
| |
2. |
If
an allegation is found to be unsupported
but has been submitted in good faith, no
further action, other than informing all
involved parties, will be taken. Reasonable
efforts will be taken to protect the standing
and the reputations of both the person(s)
making the allegation(s) and the Respondent(s).
|
| |
3. |
If
the individual conducting the Inquiry finds
the allegations to be unjust and malicious,
the Inquirer will report those findings
to the VPR. At that time, the VPR may take
such actions, or impose such sanctions,
as are appropriate to the situation. The
University will take reasonable steps to
restore the academic reputation of the person
whose conduct was the subject of the Inquiry.
|
| |
4. |
If
the outcome of the Inquiry indicates the
need for a formal investigation, the individual
conducting the Inquiry will communicate
those findings to the VPR. If the VPR
concurs with the recommendation of the
individual conducting the Inquiry, the
VPR, after notification to the appropriate
Dean(s), the Vice President for Academic
Affairs, and legal counsel, will initiate
the Investigation phase. The VPR, through
the Research Integrity Officer for the
University, must notify any sponsoring
agency or funding source, including the
ORI at a time prior to the initiation
of an Investigation. Factors to be considered
in determining the timing of such notification
include the following:
a. |
There
is an immediate health hazard involved. |
|
|
b. |
There
is an immediate need to protect
federal or state funds or equipment. |
|
|
| c. |
There
is an immediate need to protect
the interests of the person(s) making
the allegations or the individual(s)
who is the subject of the allegations
as well as co-investigators and
associates, if any. |
|
|
d. |
It
is probable that the alleged incident
will be reported publicly. |
|
|
e. |
There
is reasonable indication of possible
criminal violation. |
|
|